The Alternative Broadcasting Online News Station

The Pledge of Allegiance Defiled Through History

April 28th, 2008

The Pledge of Allegiance Defiled Through History

“I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the united states of
America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation,
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”
Information
Please Almanac 1949

Do you notice something missing? Something you were trained to
say in that pledge? Perhaps you did not know that the states of
American, once united, were actually Republics and nations in
themselves.

The big missing words we were all trained to insert in that
pledge of allegiance was “under God.” How did “God” which is
clearly the realm of the cult churches find it’s way into the
minds of simple Americans? When did church and state combine in
America? How did something so anti-American find it’s way into
the pledge?

The insidiousness and relentless pursuit of the church to take
part in all activities of government, providing the government
with docile sheep in exchange for tax subsidies on their
profits. Those long nasty tendrils of the church digging deeper
into the government and the peoples of America, contrary to the
Constitution and our heritage. Throughout history the church has
long been an enemy of the people. From their early corruptions
to the crusades, the onslaught of the Dark Ages, the
Inquisition, the slavery inflicted by the Papal States, morphing
into the Holy Roman Empire were all dispicable. As the onslaught
of the information ages made it necessary for their efforts to
take a more clandestine footprint, the Powers and the Church
became rivals for the same property and wealth; like a catfight
that continues today.

But the American Republic was founded to prevent the cults from
abusing the government and blackmailing the people and their
servants. Separation of church and state is a founding principle
in the American Republic. So why and when did “under God” get in
there?

It was 1954; George McCarthy had the people up in arms over
Communism. Communism at that time was what we call “liberal
democracy” in the corporate United States these days. A birth to
death government that handled all your affairs in exchange for
more than half your gross production value and full control of
your actions and life, the new American age. Under his guidance
the church was fully integrated within the educational system
through adding “under God” into the pledge. America was not
founded “under God” if anything it was founded outside of cults
and Americans were created by Europeans that left the church and
their infamous tortures in Europe behind to emigrate to the new
world for the freedom from the churches it provided.

The original pledge did not even contain the “one Nation” until
the civil war and in fact was just an indivisible Republic.

Today you will not hear a politician utter the words Republic.
Why I was once told off quite harshly in a forum for suggesting
that America was a Republic and told quite affirmatively that
the only republic was China. They then questioned if I was a
communist! Silly United States subjects do not understand their
own history. Most are learned professors of the 10 minutes Fox
News segments that propagate the propaganda from the Powers,
hypnotically enjoining them to drink another beer, have another
look at your favorite sports figure, or check out some girlie
bar, while telling you today George Bush and Putin have agreed
on “rule of law” and Democracy. America was supposed to be
guaranteed a Republic and severely warned by it’s forefathers
about the evils within Democracy. Democracy where a simple mob
can rule the masses and disrespect of personal freedom and
property can be manipulated into the minds of the masses through
media. The corporate president will exclaim everyday how we will
force Democracy and “rule of law” on the world when we are
supposed to be a Republic with “inalienable rights” and no one
seems to notice or care.

Rick Siegel thinks outside the box at Rick Siegel WebSite.

The Bush “There Or Here” Fallacy and the War in Iraq

April 10th, 2008

Today we wish to examine a fallacy, or error in reasoning, which
we have found springing up now and again in today’s popular
discourse about the so-called War On Terror. This one comes
straight from the top — well, not the VERY top — but from
Washington D.C. You have heard the President say it on national
teevee, and so have we: “We either have to fight them [the
terrorists] over there [i.e. Iraq], or we have to fight them
over here [i.e. inside the U.S. border].”

Now we have chosen to examine this particular Bushism because,
here, Mr. Bush has offered quite the textbook example of what
informal logic-addicts call, a “false disjunction,” or simply
the “either-or” fallacy. To commit this error in reasoning, you
only need to oversimplify a range of many options, reducing it
to a pretended range that limits them to two logically-possible
options only.

For instance, isn’t possible that, if the U.S. pulled its troops
from Iraq, using many of them to assist with border patrol
duties, that we could avoid fighting “them” here by not letting
them in, and yet not fight them “there” either? Now, to be sure,
many will hasten to point out that they see this as impractical,
ill-advised (for whatever reason), etc. My only point remains
this: the option I have mentioned is logically possible. And I
could imagine quite a few others.

For instance, the U.S. could spend a handsome little sum on
policing our domestic internal affairs, and arrest all
terrorists before they can do any harm. We have already arrested
quite a few of them here without any fight whatever. One might
argue that bloodless arrests seem much better, not to mention a
good deal cheaper, than national invasions where the whole
countryside gets shot up.

Now, if the U.S. can act with pre-emptive success in Iraq (for
the president has suggested many times that it can), why can it
not do so also much closer to home? But if the U.S. cannot do so
on its home turf, why should anyone think they can do it in Iraq?

Remember, I do not mean to argue here against the U.S. presence
in Iraq, but only to critique one particular reason offered for
it by the president. He has, after all, listed quite a few
different reasons for the invasion, at different times — which
may or may not be a good thing.

For today, then, let the reader take away this lesson in the
logic of popular discourse — never reduce a range of many
possible options to two only, unless you prepare well enough to
show that the others do not represent truly logical options.
Otherwise, you will have committed the either-or fallacy.

This brief lesson in critical thinking has been brought to you
by Ophir Gold Corporation.

San Francisco Gun Ban Knocked Down

March 10th, 2008

San Francisco Superior Court Judge James Warren struck down the new San Francisco gun ban. The law originally stated that all handguns in the San Francisco city limits were against the law. The Superior Court Judge said that the law went against the second amendment. San Francisco did not and does not have the right to ban any legal firearm from a law abiding citizen.

The San Francisco Police Department opposed the ban. The SFPD thought that the law went against the rights of San Francisco citizens and they were not allowed to carry a firearm when they were off duty. The National Rifle Association also opposed the ban. Wayne LaPierre the Executive Vice President of the NRA said that the Proposition H was an ill-covered plan to get rid of all firearms. I have to agree with him.

Some have stated that the law when passed by voters was designed to fool them into thinking things that were not true. Some citizens are saying that they were misled by their politicians. This is how the elected officials do business in San Francisco. I’m sure there are some good officials there, but the bad ones over shadow the good.

San Francisco is one of the most liberal places in America. Berkely, California falls close behind. One of San Francisco’s city councilmen said on Fox News recently that we do not need a military. He refused to apologize for the comments and he was even asked if he mis-spoke. After given the opportunity to retract his statements numerous times, he continued to spill the left wing propoganda.

One day San Francisco will have to wake up and take accountability for their actions. Some don’t want a military, and some don’t want guns, some want anarchy, and some want peace, and some just want to move. San Francisco is a lovely city with a lot of rich history. It would be a shame if they were to continue down the road of craziness. San Francisco, do the rest of America a big favor, get with the program!

Jeffery S. Miller is the author of the Higgins Series. Miller was called the “Voice of the People” by his radio listeners on his political program. Feel free to visit his site at http://www.freewebs.com/jefferysmiller

False Documents of Undocumented Remains Problematic

February 2nd, 2008

As the United States Senate and President George Bush try to come to some understanding of what is needed to properly address the illegal entry of non-resident aliens to the United States, for the 12 to 20 million illegal aliens already residing in the U.S., the issue of existing false documentation has yet to be honestly addressed.

But proposed legislation in the Senate leading to a path of legal residency and ultimately citizenship for those illegal aliens presently residing in the U.S. would involve presentation of proof of identity and length of residency.

The problem will be whether or not the illegal or “undocumented” aliens will be willing to admit that their status in the U.S. is illegal, or will continue to maintain that the documentation they hold is valid, even if fraudulent and illegally obtained. In order to do so, there would have to be an amnesty program, but President Bush has insisted that his proposal for legal residency of illegal aliens is not an amnesty program which presents a problem.

Forms of identification, necessary to secure employment, are a valid Social Security card and either a valid Work Visa or Green Card, and in some cases an Individual Tax Identification Number (ITIN) in lieu of a Social Security number. However, employers rarely check as to whether the documents they are presented with are actually legal documents, partly because of their authentic appearance.

The sophistication of computer technology over the past several years, has led to the manufacture of official looking counterfeit immigration documents. Illegal residents no longer need depend on flea markets or corner stores which once only sold less valid-looking identification. Forged document mills have become big business in both the U.S. and Mexico, yielding billions of dollars each year. And for those people crossing the border through smugglers or chauffeured in by other means from Mexico, they are usually provided not only access to the U.S. by said smugglers but given fraudulent documentation and identities as well included in the price.

Presently, the fraudulent document business is what many experts in law enforcement are saying is akin to organized crime, due to its vast network of operations. Most well known is the Castorena Family Organization (CF0). According to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) the Castorena’s have dominated a big part of the printing and distribution business of forged documents since they arrived in the U.S. from Mexico in the late 1980’s. And ICE has knowledge that the CFO now has operations in all 50 states.

Julie Myers, Director of ICE, has referred to document forgery in the U.S. as epidemic. And although Myers says that ICE is joining multi-agency task forces to crack down on forged document rings nationwide, it still leaves little resources left to weed out the existing individual holders of illegal documents being used to gain employment, gain access to state and federal entitlement programs as well as driver’s licenses and voter registration cards.

As part of the average $2,000.00 smuggling fee given to those referred to as “coyotes” who transport or smuggle Mexicans illegally over the U.S. border, those illegally entering are either given a package of fraudulent documents or are given contact numbers for illicit vendors selling the various documents. They range in price from $100.00 - $500.00, depending upon the number of documents and the quality of their authenticity. But the most desirable documents are acquired from the Castorena network.

The forged document mills were an answer to the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act which required that potential employees present a Social Security card, driver’s license, or voter registration card as proof of legal residency to their employer. But the 1986 law also mandates that there be civil penalties invoked for those employers of illegal aliens, and rarely has it ever been enforced.

Yet, contrary to the headlines and television broadcast videos shown, not all Mexicans coming into the U.S. walk through the hot desert heat and risk their health and safety to enter. The coyote business has also become more sophisticated and some have become one-stop-shop operations. For more money, of course, people are transported in cabs with the coyote dressed as a taxi driver and the passenger well dressed and carrying money. For example, the cab might be full of shopping bags of new clothing from San Diego stores when going through the border crossing to show law enforcement that the illegal alien is a wealthy Mexican merely visiting the U.S. The coyote assures the uneventful passage through the border by advising the passenger on how best to not tip off law enforcement. They then make their way through to Los Angeles whereupon the illegal alien is met by friends or relatives. They are now on their way to their new life.

Also, little spoken of in the mainstream media are Mexicans actually of well-to-do means and good educational or vocational backgrounds who choose to forego a professional career in Mexico. Many white-collar jobs in Mexico pay less than, for example, putting up sheetrock in the U.S. For the Mexican trade school graduate, appliance repair in Mexico could pay $100.00 a week. But in the U.S., a refrigerator repairman, for example, earns approximately $35.00 an hour. And for doctors and nurses from Mexico, many decide on blue-collar work upon arrival in the U.S., as they are without the proper medical certification in order to practice medicine. However, they do not seem to appear to have trouble in accessing forged U.S. documents.

But whether they are rich or poor, the issue of false identity remains an intrinsic problem of immigration and necessitates it being a part of any discussion concerning immigration reform. For it is the predominance of fraudulent documentation which is the gateway to life in the U.S. for illegal aliens, and for those who have already established lives in the U.S., albeit illegally. And while 13 states now issue driver’s licenses to illegal aliens the ramifications of owning such a photo ID are extensive.

But in North Carolina, for example, the state does not require any identification other than a utility bill or other proof of address in order to complete its Spanish-language voter registration form. North Carolina presently has no system to know if an illegal alien registers to vote. Upon applying for a driver’s license, most states comply with the 1993 Motor Voter Act which allows citizens to register to vote at the same time they apply for a driver’s license or state issued ID. All that is required is a Social Security card or ITIN to receive a driver’s license. And all anyone need do is to say that they are a citizen in order to register to vote.

Although there are many documented reports of non-citizens voting there is no enforcement of the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act which makes it a federal crime for non-citizens to vote in any federal or state election, unless authorized by the state. Advocates for legalizing illegal aliens would like the government and the public to believe that those illegally living in the U.S. have no interest in voting. In fact that may be true. But a voter registration card is an immensely valuable tool as it is a document which may be accepted by employers as validation of identification when combined with a Social Security card for employment.

But non-citizens on the voter registration rolls legally nullifies and skews the process of redrawing Congressional and state electoral districts after each U.S. Census is taken. Voter registrations are supposed to be representative of legal U.S. citizens who legally vote. Lawmakers benefit from the illegal representation of unlawful residents and those who illegally register to vote as they are counted as valid constituents.

Additionally, jury pools for jury duty are compiled from a municipality’s voter registration records. If illegal non-citizens are chosen for jury duty, they can have a profound impact on the determination of legal decisions. Verdicts by juries in which non-citizens have served on could very well be overturned should it be found out that a non-citizen participated in the jury process in its rendering a verdict.

These are but a few indications of the wide ranging and deep-rooted consequences of what the false document industry has bred. There sadly are many, many more. But ownership of false documents by illegal aliens now begs another question. In order to receive benefit of the path to citizenship which both the Senate and the Bush administration have proposed, will not illegal aliens then need to admit that they have been using fraudulent documents in order to become employed, receive state and federal benefits, receive an education, drive and register to vote? For if they really want to come out of the shadows as their advocates continue to claim, then illegal aliens will have to abide by the law and reveal their true identities. However, that proposition may ultimately prove too foreign for them to bear.

Diane M. Grassi - EzineArticles Expert Author

Diane M. Grassi is a freelance columnist, reporting and writing commentary on current events of the day providing honest and often politically incorrect assessments. From U.S. public policy to Major League Baseball, she is an eclectic thinker, and demanding of her readers to reflect on their own thinking patterns from an alternative perspective. Whether you agree with her or not, Diane M. Grassi will have you coming back to note her opinions, and if at best she wakes you up, then her goal will have been accomplished.

Ms. Grassi is featured with the online publications: New Media Journal.us; American Chronicle; Mich News.com; Opinions Editorials; the Conservative Voice; Liberty Watch Magazine as well as many others. She also writes regular columns on Major League Baseball where she is a featured online columnist with The Diamond Angle Baseball Ezine and Sports-Central.org Ms. Grassi may contacted at: dgrassi@cox.net

World Moving from Socialism to Capitalism

October 13th, 2007

The recent Jakarta summit of Asia and Africa brought remembrance of Jawaharlal Nerhru. At Bandung, Nehru had initiated the non – alignment movement and proclaiming the resistance to the big powers for exploiting the underdeveloped countries for the economic benefits. This was treated as a Socialistic approach of Nehru and well praised by the world.

This Nehru’s socialism should have reduced the poverty with help of the state run company and equal distribution of wealth.

Ironically, socialistic approach of Nehru never worked in the practical world, which has miserably failed across the world.

In the recent summit at Jakarta Dr. Manmohan Singh was elected as a president of the Afro- Asia community with 106 countries. Dr. Manmohan Singh an financial reformer of Indian economy, was insisting on the spreading the globalization on the Horizontal level across the world.

This will help most of the developing and underdeveloped countries, which will give an access to the best science and latest technology. This in turn will also develop the economic status, health care, education level of these countries.

This can be seen as the global acceptance of the Globalization for stability and giving the dignified life to these people in those countries. Today, economist are speaking about reducing the poverty with the help of open economy and creating more opportunities by globalization.

-Mr. Ravindra Nerpawar

About the Author

Ravindra Nerpawar

• Active involvement with NGO called Parikrama Foundation at Bangalore.

• Academic interest in Co-operate Business Management, Economics International Affairs, Governance and Public Policy.

• Spiritually inclined, perusing spiritualism through mediation practice.
• Reading books on Spiritualism, Business Management, Economics etc.

Fast Food : No Legal Recourse

October 6th, 2007

Do you eat fast food? You must. According to the House of Representatives, the fast food industry is a significant part of our national economy. It did not become that way be having few customers. Many independent researches have found that fast food is unhealthy and causes weight gain. This research suggests there is something “faulty” with fast food. Our nation is becoming more obese by the day and many obese people are attributing their weight gain to fast food consumption.

In the documentary Super Size Me, it was proved that eating fast food promotes poor health and weight gain—even without over eating. In response to this “faulty” product, some are turning to the legal system for justice. However, a cleverly devised bill was created called the “Personal Responsibility in Food Consumption Act of 2005.” This bill was sent to the house (H.R. 554) and on October 21, 2005 is passed by a vote of 306 to 120. The bill is now in front of the Senate, where it is expected to pass.

The House of Representatives, in this case, found the following:

1. The food and beverage industries are a significant part of our national economy.
2. The activities of the manufacturers and sellers of food and beverages substantially affect interstate and foreign commerce.
3. A person’s weight gain, obesity or a health condition associated with a person’s weight gain or obesity is based on a multitude of factors, including genetic factors and the lifestyle and physical fitness decisions.
4. Fostering a culture of acceptance of personal responsibility is one of the most important ways to promote a healthier society, lawsuits seeking to blame individual food and beverage providers for a person’s weight gain, obesity or health condition are legally frivolous and economically damaging.
5. The American food industry is the nation’s leading private sector employer.

If you notice in the above findings, the basis of this soon-to-be law is economically motivated and not devised for the betterment of a healthier society. In their purpose and summary statement, the House of Representatives basically said that fast food establishments should not be held liable for the damage their products cause due to “over-consumption.” What is interesting is that these fast food companies have never, to my knowledge, defined what “proper-consumption” is. How can you have over-consumption when you have not defined what proper-consumption is?

If a typical American simply eats his or her regular three meals a day at a food establishment and his or her health deteriorates as a result, shouldn’t that establish be held responsible for serving a “faulty” product? H.R. 554 is an attempt to remove the liability of food providers and silence the legal resource by consumers. The next time you walk into a fast food establishment, see if you can located the “proper-consumption” documentation.

Jason A. Martin is a Journalism Major (Political Science minor) and future law school student. His blog deals with Politics, Media and the Law. You can view it at JasonAMartin.com.

My “Scaridness”

October 5th, 2007

I’m scared. I’m scared. So very, very scared. I’m so scared that
scare is a word not enough to define my “scaridness”.

“They’re lurking”. “They’re plotting”. “They’re patient”. “They
want to take away my way of life”.

They want to take away my “scaridness” (not to be mistaken with
“truthiness”).

I can’t let them do that. I love my “scaridness”. It’s a sacred
“scaridness”. It lets me know that I’m alive. If I didn’t have
“scaridness”, I’d be dead. Being scared makes me feel alive.

Thank God that Bush, Rove, Cheney, and Rumsfeld understand the
sanctity of my “scaridness”. If it wasn’t for them, some a**hole
would be holding up a Constitution, a Bill of Rights, or quoting
FDR’s infamous “All we have to fear is fear itself” crap.

“Scaridness” is something that has served humanity well over the
years. It works well.

Damn those people who are trying to take my “scaridness” away.
Those who say that it’s time to take a pause and look at things
like the Patriot Act, warrantless surveillance, torture, and
water- boarding are fools. Next they’ll be coming after my
snowboard.

They even argue about “renditions”. Something defined as:

1) The act of rendering. 2) An interpretation of a musical score
or a dramatic piece. 3) A performance of a musical or dramatic
work. 4) A translation, often interpretive. 5) A surrender.

Only a fool would not understand that a “rendition” is nothing
more than a “surrender” to an “interpretive” “musical score” or
a “dramatic work”. Just like in the movies.

I hope these people who are trying to take my “scaridness” away
aren’t successful.

I love my “scaridness”.

It’s all we have. It’s “our way of life”.

Your Government at Work: Gitmo Torture and Beyond

October 2nd, 2007

The American Civil Liberties Union has undertaken the task of obtaining declassified documentation of prisoner abuse in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (Gitmo).

The documents were obtained under a Freedom of Information Act request (the FOIA is a federal law that allows the public access to documents and other information from the federal government) on Oct. 7, 2003, and the ACLU has been releasing the documents to the public as they’ve received them. The collection of documents contains 35,000 pages of information.

The documents paint a picture of prisoner abuse that goes way beyond the “isolated” incidents at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. In fact, what we find are instead widespread allegations of abuse. Of course, George W. Bush’s defenders like to pretend that even if there was prisoner abuse, it wasn’t that bad (Rush Limbaugh famously likened the abuse at Abu Ghraib to a fraternity hazing. You know, the hazing that involves stripping someone naked, or withholding food for hours, or the use of attack dogs to terrify the young pledge, or sodomizing that pledge with a glow-stick. Those fraternity rituals. Oh, and raping of the fraternity pledge. Those wacky college kids!), why…look at all of those mass graves in Iraq! Saddam Hussein was much worse! Which, while true, doesn’t change the fact that, as of September 30, 2004, the Pentagon had investigated 187 allegations of prisoner abuse. Apparently, the right wing’s definition of the word “isolated” is a bit different than the commonly accepted use of the word.

One of the FBI memos obtained by the ACLU discuss the alleged impersonation of FBI agents by Department of Defense interrogators. It is dated December 5, 2003 (some of the FBI abbreviations used: “EC” is “Electronic Communication”; “CTD” is “Counterterrorism Division; “MLDU” is “Military Liaison and Detainee Unit”; “CITF” is “Criminal Investigation Task Force) and states:

“I am forwarding this EC up the CTD chain of command. MLDU requested this information be documented to protect the FBI. MLDU has a long standing and documented position against use of some of DOD’s interrogation practices, however we were not aware of these latest techniques until recently…of concern, DOD interrogators impersonating Supervisory Special Agents of the FBI told a detainee (blacked out)…these tactics have produced no intelligence of a threat neutralizing nature to date at CITF believes that techniques have destroyed any chance of prosecuting this detainee. If this detainee is ever released or his story made public in any way, DOD interrogators will not be held accountable because these torture techniques were done (by) the “FBI” interrogators. The FBI will (be) left holding the bag before the public.”

Now, why would a Department of Defense interrogator impersonate an FBI agent? As we can see from the memorandum, the answer is pretty clear: the interrogators used forms of torture not approved by the FBI. Which probably goes beyond a fraternity hazing, and perhaps edges closer to the techniques employed by Saddam Hussein’s regime.

As far as allegations that a copy of the Quran had been flushed in a toilet, the Associated Press reported on May 26 that the prisoner who made the claim had since retracted his story. But military investigators did uncover five instances where the Quran was “mishandled.” Brig. Gen. Jay W. Wood, the commander of the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, told reporters that a military investigation did uncover five instances where the Quran was mishandled: four by guards, and one time by an interrogator.

The FBI documents outline other allegations of abuse at Gitmo, including detainee reports of being beaten by guards, and in one instance, the sexual assault of a detainee. In April 2003, a detainee reported that a female guard had fondled his genitals while male guards held him down. The female guard told the detainee that she was having her menstrual period and proceeded to wipe blood on the detainee.

Aren’t we supposed to be better than this? Prisoner abuse is something done by our enemies, not us. And yet, in every instance where someone from the Bush administration tried to explain away the abuse as “isolated,” we discover that the abuse was not isolated, and if the FBI documents are any indication, the abuse is widespread and frequent. Yet no one from the Department of Defense or Justice Department are being held accountable for the abuse of prisoners. And probably never will. After all, the Bush administration had its “accountability” moment in the 2004 election; top-level officials have nothing to worry about. And we can all pretend that the most important issues of the day are the appointment of a handful of President Bush’s judicial nominees to various courts. We’ll just look the other way when it comes to torture and violations of the Geneva Convention. Oh, and Social Security, that’s a pretty important national discussion. Prisoner abuse? Who cares? Give me the remote control; it’s time to watch the latest news on the Michael Jackson trial.

About the Author

Scott C. Smith is a freelance writer from Beaverton, Oregon. Scott is a columnist for the web site Counterbias.com

Scott’s columns have also appeared at the popular liberal web sites The Democratic Underground and The Smirking Chimp.

In addition to his column, Scott writes about media and politics at his blog, “What’s In Scott’s Head,” at Scottcsmith dot net.

Capitol Criminals

October 1st, 2007

Since the Clintons left office, Democrats have been a little dull, resisting the urge to engage in high crimes and misdemeanors. But, lo and behold, now we’re recovering from a Democratic crime wave in Washington. And, what’s so fascinating about the situation is that the self-proclaimed party of peace and love has members who are engaging in downright dangerous, even violent acts.

And they’re getting off scot-free.

First, there’s the case of Patrick Kennedy—one of the few impaired drivers in the U.S. who apparently never has to worry about failing a field sobriety test, since Capitol Police refused to administer one to him.

Fresh from rehab, the junior Kennedy suggests he now feels good—presumably without the use of controlled substances. Kennedy sought treatment after his automobile crashed in the middle of the night near the U.S. Capitol. While the police said he appeared intoxicated, they didn’t test him for it.

And so, a drunk/drugged driver walks free, without any type of punishment.

Given the number of Americans who die each year from drug or alcohol-related crashes—nearly 17,000 in 2004—the kids-glove treatment of Kennedy is a national disgrace.

It also makes you wonder—why should any D.C. teen stop indulging in drugs and alcohol, when he knows that a Congressman can easily indulge and not pay the penalty?

But Capitol criminal activity does not begin and end with Kennedy. There’s also the case of Rep. Cynthia McKinney, who slugged a police officer but was not indicted. What makes this injustice all the more appalling is that McKinney blamed the incident on racial profiling. As House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Illinois) indicated, this embarrassing situation was not the result of profiling, but the result of an ego in overdrive.

Physical assaults are inexcusable. An attack on a law enforcement officer is reprehensible. Why should any D.C. teen respect police, when a Congresswoman doesn’t—and gets away with it?

Here the Democrats are, condemning President George W. Bush for being a warmongering cowboy, when they themselves are wreaking havoc on D.C. streets, showing absolutely no respect for the law—or those who enforce it.
I’m not sure how any Democrat can, with a straight face, insist on talking about peace in Iraq when members of the party are disrupting the peace on city streets. In addition, we hear ad nauseam about how the Washington ethics scandal will bring down Republicans in Congress, and yet the mainstream media seem to ignore the fact that drunk driving and assault are clearly unethical behavior. Was Rep. Tom DeLay really any more dangerous than Congressman Kennedy after a bender, or Rep. McKinney on a bad hair day?

Of course, the Democrats have all-too-willing accomplices in the national news media. For network reporters, violent acts are not the unforgivable sin—a refusal to enact campaign finance legislation is. With national polls showing that many members of the national news media support abortion but appear to be personally opposed to church attendance, it shouldn’t be surprising that reporters have a skewed idea of what constitutes morality.

In the end, it really doesn’t matter if a Congressional representative presents himself or herself as a champion of the poor, the downtrodden, the addicted, the mentally ill, the learning impaired, and the disabled. If he or she engages in criminal conduct and is not punished, he or she is, in fact, an elitist, believing that laws to protect public welfare are for the little people—not those who work under the Capitol dome.

It’s time Congressional Democrats got a handle on the crime problem—their own.

Copyright © 2006 by Nathan Tabor

Nathan Tabor is a conservative political activist based in Kernersville, North Carolina. He has a bachelor’s degree in psychology and a master’s degree in public policy. He is a contributing editor at http://www.theconservativevoice.com and his 60-second commentaries are heard on over 250 stations daily. He writes weekly for Townhall.com, HumanEventsOnline.com, Crosswalk.com and many others. You can contact him at Nathan@nathantabor.com.

The Intelligence Summit Misses the Mark: The German-Jesuit Threat to World Peace

September 28th, 2007

Greetings to one and all, in the name and memory of Herbert W.
Armstrong who visited and addressed many leaders of the nations
you represent here today. Mr. Armstrong, ambassador for world
peace without political portfolio, was a man sent by the Great
Creator God (who made all men and determined the boundaries and
languages of each nation) to deliver a bittersweet message.

I shall also deliver that bittersweet message, standing before
you, facing the nations, dressed in a black t shirt, jeans and
sackcloth — not your typical attire for such important affairs,
but these are not normal times and business as usual will soon
be history, as you all very much know and express your concern
by gathering here in the United States of America to address
these issues that threaten all mankind.

The world waits with bated breath to hear the recording of the
former tyrant Saddam Hussein and questions whether they will
confirm his weapons of mass destruction program and justify
President George W. Bush’s decision to launch his preemptive
attack against belligerent Iraq. Regardless, our American troops
have already been dispatched, they have bravely fought and
deposed the proud dictator who imagined himself a modern
Nebuchadnezzar driven to destroy the Jews, and free elections
have now been held in that liberated country - not that
democracy alone is the message God has ordained our
British-Israelite nations to spread. But I share with you a
greater recording
that will directly affect each and every
one of you, and trouble your nations and bring mankind to the
brink of extinction unless that “Strong Unseen Hand from
Someplace” intervenes and saves us from ourselves.

>From reading Ryan Mauro’s book, Death to America: The
Unreported Battle of Iraq
— it was impressed upon my mind
how mad some Muslims are driven by the jinns of jihad and
insanely seek to wreak havoc and destruction upon all the world
who rejects their false vision. I gladly testify that not all
Muslims share their perverted passion, as is evident in noble
men like Sheik Abdul Hadi Palazzi of Rome, Italy.

However, I do solemnly affirm that such spiritual sickness does
not only afflict the Muslim world, but that such religious
fanaticism is again to rear its ugly head in blood-soaked
Europe. Europe’s rapid response to jihad will be a new
crusade that will slaughter both Arabs and Jews and every
Christian who doesn’t agree with the Roman Catholic Church!

The Prophet Daniel records some great provocation, an Islamic
confederation or network of sorts that is soon to butt heads
with Catholic Europe (Daniel 11:40-45), resulting in a
blitzkrieg operation that will strike them dead in the Middle
East, taking out countries like Egypt and subduing Libya and
Ethiopia and undoubtedly overwhelming Iran.

That is good news. Europe — not America — will
neutralize the Nazi-Muslim threat. However, the bad news is that
it will bring out the beast in Europe and only whet
their appetite
for more blood. Europe will morph into the
final revival of the unholy Roman Empire of the German Nation,
and demand Jerusalem become an “international city,” as called
for by the accursed UN Resolution 181. The Germans and
Jesuits have been the major influence behind this strategic move
and have their evil eyes on the prize of Jerusalem, especially
the coveted Temple Mount.

The whole world has been focusing on Islamic terrorism, as is
understandable, but the greatest threat to world peace is the
German-dominated European Union!
The United States has
foolishly been helping to create such a Frankenstein Monster
that will brutally betray both the American, British and Jewish
peoples. He
rbert W. Armstrong warned of this clear and present danger
– as an early warning system — for years. The weapons of mass
destruction that the increasingly fascist EU possess will
unleash nuclear terror upon our major cities and rain down death
and destruction upon us and those who survive will suffer
deportation due to our idolatry and immorality.

These biblical warnings, based upon reliable information
obtained from Daniel and the Book of Revelation, are the
greatest recording all mankind must hear and heed
— if
we’re to be spared from WWIII. I’m here to announce this plain
truth as a witness and a warning and share it within Beyond Babylon: Europe’s Rise and
Fall.
What you do with it is between you and your Maker,
but I encourage you to take it seriously and choose life
and help save your respective nations.

Next Page »